Phillip 'The Irritant' Adams. I definitely need to cast a wider podcast subscription net.

Julie 'Faux Sensual' Rigg. Ah, where would i be without hearing you fawn all over film directors?

Acting foolish ...
Bustin' a move, ancient Mexico-style ...
Take heed. It's good advice.
So, Cortez arrived in 1519 and King Montezuma believed he was the prophesised bearded, white skinned God Quetzalcoatl. Perhaps it's because of the King's beliefs, that the great empire fell so swiftly to those few European conquerers.
The Spanish drained the lake and built on it, enslaving and killing and spreading the word of God as they went. A bit of a problem now as the buildings are now sinking. The undergound aquifer has been tapped into to such a degree that some parts of the city have sunk 10 metres.
In the next photo you can see in the background the cathedral built by the Spanish. It was built symbolically directly on top of Montezuma's Aztec temple. In the foreground lie the only remaining visible ruins of the Aztec pyramids. It was destroyed and the stones used to build the Catholic cathedral.
The whole city is built on top of the Aztec city. As in, buried beneath the city streets are pre-hispanic constructions. It's possible to excavate, but the colonial buildings are culturally significant aswell. And so the debate continues. Which is more worthy of preservation?
Just to compound the multitude of issues facing this place, it lies in an area of frequent seismic activity. Earthquakes happen everyday apparently, but not significant ones. It's scary to think about what will happen if, and probably when the next big disaster occurs. The millions clinging onto the mountains don't stand a chance. Really terrible...
Do we have a duty of assistance to societies, lest individuals, less fortunate? I was not born silver spoon in mouth. My money, I've generally earnt as payment for work. But what is money if not the most fickle and transient of possessions? I am obligated to share it, and not certainly not begrudgingly. Do I feel like this because someone has deemed my table-clearing skills worthy of a higher wage than another person’s. For the very same work? Under vastly different conditions.
Perhaps, more than money, the price one pays is that of guilt. Not a searing, debilitating form, but a vague and constant hum, only intensified during encounters with the less well off. Sent to jolt us, shaking a couple of coins from one’s well, or not so well lined, pockets. And then off again.
Of course, there’s absolutely no way I ought to be allowed to sit here at my faux marble table, unapproached… sipping sweet coffee, Lonely Planet open, tentatively planning next jaunt. Exploiting the Mexican affordabilities thanks to its under-performing economy, while those it worst affects wave tourist maps and plastic Aztec masks and bags of boiled peanuts at me. I should shamefully and hurriedly finish my muesli and yogurt.
If you speak to some Mexicans, they will tell you that the country's economic and social issues are a result of Spanish colonialism. Aside from the multitude of problems stemming from the assimilation of indigenous 'indians', environmental ramifications or issue of morality that occurred and continue to affect post-colonial societies, this belief about the lack of prosperity in Mexico is reinforced by the folkloric affluence of that great nation to the north. The US of A.
The contemporary lamenters of past Spanish rule can fall into two categories. Those who believe Mexico would have been better off without European colonisation, and those who believe that if the British had have 'discovered' the southern continent, Latin America would today be included in the developed world.
I guess there is a valid argument there for a number of reasons. The Spanish monarchy enforced a completely different land-labour relationship than the British method, based on land stewardship rather than assignation of ownership as favoured by England. Speaking very generally, as a result, British subjects worked hard and were rewarded with land and rise in social rank. In Spanish colonies however, there was little incentive to work more than the bare minimum because all profit went to the crown and the threat of loss of title was very real.
And then the treatment of native people and attitudes towards the slave trade also differed.
But, ok, how can comparison possibly be made about former colonial settlements because nowhere is exactly alike. There's variable land conditions, time period, degree of control... it's impossible to speculate about what could have been.
One of the other major influences in incongruity of outcomes between north and south america is the encounters with the indigenous populations. The Spaniards encountered huge, powerful empires with sophisticated language, education and permanent settlement. In North America and in the Carribean, there existed sparse, separate, nomadic tribes, less robust than their southern counterparts. In other words, near genocide was relatively simple!
Also, take for example, African countries and India, a former British colony. These places don't conveniently follow the pattern of prosperity. So it's really just wishful thinking by some sectors of Mexican society.
In the end, honestly, who would wish colonial rule for their people, British or otherwise? I suppose when the economic situation is sort of dire and tenuous, it's a nice, impossible fariytale for some.
There's a large student contingent living and studying here. That means great cafes and music. Beret-wearing, bearded, boho-hobo students are thick on the ground :)
This was the balcony of our hostel. Ludicrously inexpensive, we sat drinking tequila overlooking the shimmering mountains as mariachi music wafted from the streets below. Glorious.